bibliogramma: (Default)
“The Secret Life of Bots,” Suzanne Palmer; Clarkesworld, September 2017
http://clarkesworldmagazine.com/palmer_09_17/

Palmer’s suspenseful yet very funny novellette takes place on a nearly derelict space ship on a suicide mission to stop an enemy worldkiller from reaching Earth. So much of the ship is falling apart, all the available standard bots are working nonstop to keep the ship going just long enough to deliver its payload. When there are reports of an infestation, the Ship AI pulls an outdated bot with dangerous instabilities out of storage to deal with the problems. It turns out, the dangerous instability is creative thinking, and the ship needs some of that badly if it’s going to fulfil its mission.

“Cake Baby,” Charlie Jane Anders; Lightspeed Magazine, November 2017
http://www.lightspeedmagazine.com/fiction/cake-baby-kango-sharon-adventure/

“Cake Baby” may not be the funniest science fiction romp I’ve ever read, but it comes awfully close. Sharon and Kango are two surreal characters with a real talent for fucking things up royally, which is why they may not be the best pair of interstellar adventurers to hire for your dirty work. But they manage to survive, thanks to their far more practical crewmate, ex-cultist stowaway Jara, and their ship’s computer Noreen. Very funny stuff. Really. Read it.


“The Dark Birds,” Ursula Vernon; Apex Magazine, January 9, 2017
https://www.apex-magazine.com/the-dark-birds/

Vernon often tells dark tales. This is one of them. In the forest lives a family. There’s a Father, of curse. And there is always a Mother, a Ruth , a Susan, and a Baby. When Mother has a new daughter, Ruth disappears, Susan becomes Ruth, Baby becomes Susan. That’s how it always is. Until it isn’t.


“The Fall of the Mundaneum,” Rebecca Campbell; Beneath Ceaseless Skies, September 28, 2017
http://www.beneath-ceaseless-skies.com/stories/the-fall-of-the-mundaneum/

In 1914, in a building in Belgium that houses a vast collection of books and artefacts, a man is waiting for the German army to arrive. He imagines that this great building, an establishment of knowledge and history, will be handed over honourably, to those who, while conquerors, will respect its importance. Right up to the end, he answers letters sent in by those seeking answers from the great collection, cataloguing the strange contents of a valise sent from his colleagues in Köhn, with a hasty message he understands only too late.


“Queen of Dirt,” Nisi Shawl; Apex Magazine, February 7, 2017
https://www.apex-magazine.com/queen-of-dirt/

A young martial arts instruction with the gift of seeing things most people don’t must find a way to save herself from a hive of otherworldly things seeking a new queen, and her students from the potentially dangerous consequences of contact.


“Remnant,” Jordan L. Hawk and K. J. Charles; Smashwords
https://www.smashwords.com/books/view/404000

Historical m/m romance, of the explicit sort, about two pairs of occult detectives. Apparently each of the authors is known for writing a series based on one of the pairs in this story, which is well-written, and lots of fun, both in terms of adventure and eroticism. The setting is London. A long dead Egyptian spirit is killing people, and ghost hunter Simon Feximal, with his companion Robert Caldwell, is investigating. Arriving from America just in time to lend assistance is American philologist Percival Endicott Whyborne and his companion, Griffin Flaherty. A nice blend of mystery, adventure and erotica.


“These Deathless Bones,” Cassandra Khaw; Tor.com, July 26, 2017
https://www.tor.com/2017/07/26/these-deathless-bones/

Khaw has excellently inverted the trope of the evil stepmother here, with a story of a queen married to provide a new mother for a prince whose own mother has died. But in this dark fantasy, the queen is a just avenger, and the young prince a cruel budding psychopath whose years of torturing small animals and throwing tantrums to punish the servants have led step by step to the unforgivable.
bibliogramma: (Default)
Samuel R. Delany is as well-known and respected for his literary and social/queer criticism as he is for his writing of fiction in multiple, often paraliterary, genres, from science fiction to queer erotica. Shorter Views: Queer Thoughts and the Politics of the Paraliterary, a collection of critical essays on race, sexuality, science fiction, and the art of writing, plus a number of interviews on a variety of topics, that demonstrates the breadth and depth of his thinking and his academic work in these areas, and offers the reader a sustained experience both instructive and challenging.

The book is divided into three sections - Part One: Some Queer Thoughts, Part Two: The Politics of the Paraliterary, and Part Three: Some Writing/Some Writers. These categories, while suggestive of the overarching themes of each section, should not be taken as exclusive. In the first section, for instance, Delany has gathered essays and interviews that talk about queerness, but also queerness in relation to art, to his own writing in various paraliterary genres (science fiction, pornography), in other writers. In the second, he examines theory and criticism of science fiction, comics, and other paraliterary genres, but does so from the persoective of a queer academic, critic and author. The third section looks at specific writers and works, both literary and paraliterary.

There’s a documentary about Delany, called The Polymath, or The Life and Opinions of Samuel R. Delany, Gentleman. I’ve never seen it (though I’d love to if I can ever find a coy), but one thing I am certain of, is that polymath is one of the words that one can definitely use to describe him. It’s there in his writing, in the breadth and scope of his thinking, his references, his allusions, the often very disparate threads of knowledge that he draws together in presenting his arguments. To read Delany is to learn things you never would have imagined. To read this collection of essays and interviews is to have your perspectives on race and sexuality challenged, to have your understanding of the art and practice of writing and the genre of speculative fiction - and a few other paraliterary genres - broadened.
bibliogramma: (Default)

The Feminist Porn Book: The Politics of Producing Pleasure, is a collection of essays about the making, enjoying and understanding of feminist porn edited by Tristan Taormino, Celine Parreñas Shimizu, Constance Penley, and Mireille Miller-Young.

Anyone familiar with the history of the "sex wars" knows that pornography is one of several divisive issues in the area of sexuality that has been, and continues to be, hotly debated among feminists. (Personal disclosure: my own positions during the wars were, and continue to be, primarily what has been labeled as "sex-positive.)

In their introduction, the editors state that
The Feminist Porn Book offers arguments, facts, and histories that cannot be summarily rejected, by providing on-the-ground and well-researched accounts of the politics of producing pleasure. Our agenda is twofold: to explore the emergence and significance of a thriving feminist porn movement, and to gather some of the best new feminist scholarship on pornography. By putting our voices into conversation, this book sparks new thinking about the richness and complexity of porn as a genre and an industry in a way that helps us to appreciate the work that feminists in the porn industry are doing, both in the mainstream and on its countercultural edges.
The introduction goes on to discuss the concept of feminist porn and the editors' framework for examining it.
Feminist porn is a genre and a political vision. And like other genres of film and media, feminist porn shares common themes, aesthetics, and goals even though its parameters are not clearly demarcated. Because it is born out of a feminism that is not one thing but a living, breathing, moving creation, it is necessarily contested—an argument, a polemic, and a debate. Because it is both genre and practice, we must engage it as both: by reading and analyzing its cultural texts and examining the ideals, intentions, and experiences of its producers. In doing so, we offer an alternative to unsubstantiated oversimplifications and patronizing rhetoric. We acknowledge the complexities of watching, creating, and analyzing pornographies. And we believe in the radical potential of feminist porn to transform sexual representation and the way we live our sexualities.
Contributors to the collection include such stalwart defenders of women's right to experience sexual pleasure as Betty Dodson and Suzie Bright, and pioneering creators of women-identified pornography such as Nina Hartley and Candida Royalle, as well as a range of other pornographers, academics and feminist thinkers. The politics of porn as it exists in the mainstream porn industry and the ways in which feminist porn aims at creating new power dynamics in the production and distribution of porn, and a new feminist aesthetic in the product itself, are examined from various standpoints. The authors of these essays and personal narratives look at such issues as gender expectations, race, means of production and distribution, body image politics, authenticity in representation of sexuality, queer, genderqueer and trangender images and representations, and more.

While problematic aspects of porn, even feminist porn, are acknowledged and discussed, the focus here is on porn as a medium and a message of positive sexual pleasure in which sexuality of all kinds, not just the male and heteronormative, is celebrated. As Nina Hartley points out in her essay, "Unlike Hollywood tropes, in which the “transgressive” woman must meet a horrible fate for crossing some invisible line, at the end of a porn movie the woman has had orgasms and lives to tell the tale. There are no Anna Kareninas or Emma Bovarys in porn."

bibliogramma: (Default)

Hard Core: Power, Pleasure and the “Frenzy of the Visible”, Linda Williams
Pin-up Grrls: Feminism, Sexuality, Popular Culture, Maria Elena Buszek

Where do I begin to even approach the issues surrounding the multiple meanings of the depiction of women as sexual people in North American society? How can I hope to do any kind of justice to all the words that have been spoken and written about women as subjects and/or objects of desire, of the gaze - male or female – that fixes itself on female images of sexual expression, reception, assertion, invitation.

If only it could be as simple as this: people, for the most part, like sex. They like having sex, and often, when they aren’t having sex, or when they’re preparing to have sex, or thinking about how they’d like to have sex, they enjoy looking at images of people having sex, or looking like they might want to have sex. Some people like to look at men, some at women, some at couples or groups. Some like to look at the kinds of sex they’d like to have, others prefer looking at kinds of sex they would never in a million years consider having.

But because we have brought a specific kind of power relationship into this whole sex thing, to wit, the idea that people of one sex are more powerful than people of another sex – instead of admitting that there is some kind of power dynamic in all relationships, and working with that – the meanings of looking at sex and people in sexual situations gets all mixed up with ideas of social power and control, and suddenly you’re wondering if people are looking at other people because they think they own them, or because they don’t see them as people but as objects, and all sorts of other questions about what it means to like looking at people and thinking about sex while you’re looking.

These two books are about some of the ways that people look at pictures of other people doing things that are intended to be in some way sexual, and some of the ways that people present themselves or allow others to present them as people who are doing things that are intended to be in some way sexual. They explore all those tricky questions, such as whether it is empowering or demeaning to have other people look at your picture and think about sex. And they demonstrate that the issue is complex, and the meanings, both social and personal, of looking at sexual images for the purpose of pleasure, go far beyond the simple but all-to-common argument that all pornographic images represent male objectification and degradation of women, because they are made by men for men by the means of oppressing and humiliating women. There’s some of that, but there’s a whole lot more, too.

As Buszek comments in Pin-up Grrls that “the hand that creates does not necessarily control – and that there are great pleasures to be found in exploring this contradiction.”

bibliogramma: (Default)

With a Rough Tongue: Femmes Write Porn, Amber Dawn and Trish Kelly, eds.

As I think I’ve mentioned before, I’m rather selective about the porn I read. The most boring sort for me is the standard male/female porn – especially if it’s aimed primarily at a male audience.

I find reading about sex – vanilla or kinky – between two (or more) women, or two (or more) men much more interesting. I could theorise that this is because same-sex sex is by definition without the inherent implications of the male/female power imbalance, so that any power dynamics and gender roles in the exchange are deliberately chosen by the participants.

Which brings me to With a Rough Tongue: Femmes Write Porn. I find the butch/femme dynamic interesting, both in fiction and in cultural studies, at least in part because I don’t identify as either – though my partner, despite being male, identifies as femme. Being femme (or butch, but we're talking about femmes here) is more than a gender identity, it's a sexual identity.

This volume presents a range of interpretations of being femme in sexual situations. And it’s hot reading, too. If stories about femmes at their peak of sexual presentation are your thing, you’ll find at least something in this collection to enjoy.

bibliogramma: (Default)

I enjoy reading essays about politics, life, culture, current events and other such things from a feminist or a socialist perspective (or if I'm lucky, both together). In fact, it's probably from such American essayists that I get most of my ideas about what life in the US is probably like for real people (as opposed to the people in American-made films and TV shows, which would be my other source of information on life in America).

Three collections of essays with somewhat different perspectives that I've read recently are:

Don’t Think, Smile! – Notes on a Decade of Denial, Ellen Willis
Virginity or Death, Katha Pollitt
On Sex, Motherhood, Porn and Apple Pie, Susie Bright

Willis' collection of essays touch on a number of social, political and cultural issues and events from the 90s in America, from free speech to racism, the ideology behind The Bell curve to the million Man March, from the authoriarianism of the right to the complicity of the left. The seven essays collected here form a very thoughtful review of crucial social and political themes in the last decade of the 20th century, it's well worth reading.

Pollitt has assembled five years' of columns for The Nation in this collection, which touches on just about everything that's happened in those years, from the furor over the death of Terry Schiavo to the erosion of abortion access to the American response to the 9/11 attacks to war in Iraq to the growth of the anti-science movement among the right, and on and on. Short and pithy, each essay gave me insight and the pleasure of reading a fearless, intelligent and witty analysis of events and issues as they unfolded.

Bright is a fearless analyst of contemporary sexual mores, and recounts with humour and intelligence her own journey toward an erotics of feminism. This collection of essays continues to challenge mainstream American (and North American) ideas about sex, women, pronographyrelationships, mothering, and other such topics, and includes a great recipe for apple pie.

All three essayists offer food for thought on the American condition , and I'm richer in knowledge and insight for having read these three books.

bibliogramma: (Default)

Boy in the Middle – Patrick Califia

I’m very picky about my porn. I prefer stories to pictures, but they have to be well-written, with interesting characters and scenarios. I like my porn kinky, and I don’t much care what genders are involved, as long as the story draws me in rather than leaves me outside looking.

Patrick Califia’s work does all that for me. Califia’s own sexual journey has given him a broad perspective on genders, orientations, kink, leather, all the delicious flavours and smells, touches, sights and sounds of desire, and you’ll find all of them in the stories collected in Boy in the Middle. As Califia says in the introduction to this feast of pansexuality:
So here is a book that celebrates several forms of passion. It is diverse, perverse, and bold. Not all of the sex within these pages is same-sex, but it is all queer.
If this sounds like your cup of tea, then I can promise you hours of reading pleasure.

bibliogramma: (Default)

Full Exposure, Suzie Bright

Full Exposure is Susie Bright’s erotic manifesto; in the opening chapter she says:
In this book, I want to cut through all the labels and the politics and reveal what I’ve learned about sex – what has been transformative for me as a lover, a parent, a daughter, and an artist. I want to argue that sexuality is the soul of the creative process and that erotic expression of any kind is a personal revolution.
Sex gets no respect in North American culture. It may get a lot of attention, but that’s far from being the same. We look at most of the facets of our selves and agree that it is important that they be realised, expressed, integrated into our lives. Our intellect, our spirituality, our ethics and values, our compassion, our actions, our loves, our work, all of this infuses and informs all the other things we do. But sex, that we put in a box. Our erotic selves are supposed to be kept separate, private, apart.

Of course, they don’t stay there. They break out and demand attention – but the kind of attention that is given to the erotic maintains the distance, the separation, the isolation of sexuality in our selves and our lives. Full Exposure gives us Bright’s experiences and insights on breaking down the walls and being fully erotic people, just as much as we are, or strive to be, fully loving, fully spiritual, fully thinking, fully caring people.

Profile

bibliogramma: (Default)
bibliogramma

May 2019

S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930 31 

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 28th, 2025 02:54 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios