bibliogramma: (Default)
Kim Stanley Robinson is kind of a hit-or-miss author for me. Some of the books that I’ve read, I’ve quite enjoyed; others, I bounce off hard. New York 2140, which is a finalist for this year’s Hugo awards, is unfortunately one of those that I bounce off. Nonetheless, because it is a finalist, I’ve done my best to set aside the fact that it doesn’t really interest me, and forge through.

If you asked me why I had trouble engaging with the book, I’m not sure I could tell you why. Some of it is that, because I’m not American, New York is not an icon for me. This is a book that depends on the city’s mythology and mystique, to some extent. The careful work that Robinson has done in envisioning this particular city, adapted to a 50 foot rise in sea level, is probably a solid hook for anyone with a strong sense of the place, whether real or imagined. Me, I can’t tell Brooklyn from the Bronx, so the changes in either that such a submergence might bring don’t mean a lot to me. Then, too, there’s a lot of high finance and day trading and such, and the games of capitalism bore and annoy me. Robinson isn’t all that fond of capitalism either, but just because we agree on that point doesn’t mean I want to read about his characters making imaginary money on imaginary mortgage bundles.

There are some characters who are more interesting, such as the two coders who try to hack the global system and end up disappearing, and the woman who sets out to discover what happened to them, and some folks who are just trying to survive in a half-drowned and very broken world, but it’s not quite enough. Somehow, Robinson seems to have put more effort into the characters I don’t much give a damn about, leaving the others, the ones that might have gotten me hooked, not fully fleshed.

And there are a lot of viewpoint characters and plotlines in this novel, linked by the fact that they all live in (or in some cases squat in, which is a distinction worth noting) the same building, the Met Life tower, with one exception. There’s Mutt and Jeff, two temporarily homeless coders; Franklin the day trader, who soecialises in trading submerged real estate futures; Inspector Gen, a police official conducting a casual investigation into the disappearance of Mutt and Jeff; Amelia, an activist on behalf of endangered species and media star; Charlotte, an advocate for the poor and undocumented immigrants; Stefan and Roberto, two very young homeless entrepreneurs who live in the boat they moor at the Met; Vlade, the superintendant of the Met Life building; and an unnamed ‘citizen’ who speaks directly to the reader, acting as a kind of chorus and providing history, context, and general, somewhat sardonically toned infodumps. While each character or set of characters, with the exception of the citizen chorus, have their own story line, the disappearance if Mutt and Jeff is a major throughline, as is a mysterious offer to purchase the building from the residents co-op that currently owns it. As the novel progresses, various linkages arise between the multiple protagonists, from accidental encounters to developing relationships, and the individual plotlines begin to intertwine and converge. And when they do, just as a massive natural disaster strikes the city, the bubbling sense of discontent that Robinson has been slowly nurturing in his characters and the people around them erupts into a revolt of the commons that is really quite satisfying. Although it may or may not last, and may or may not bring about real change, for as the cynical citizen chorus reminds us:

“So no, no, no, no! Don’t be naïve! There are no happy endings! Because there are no endings! And possibly there is no happiness either! Except perhaps in some odd chance moment, dawn in the clean washed street, midnight out on the river, or more likely in the regarding of some past time, some moment encased in a cyst of nostalgia, glimpsed in the rearview mirror as you fly away from it. Could be happiness is always retrospective and probably therefore made up and even factually wrong. Who knows. Who the fuck knows. Meanwhile get over your childlike Rocky Mountain desire for a happy ending, because it doesn’t exist. Because down there in Antarctica—or in other realms of being far more dangerous—the next buttress of the buttress could go at any time.”

It’s an ambitious novel, a complex novel, a well-crafted novel - indeed, in lesser hands the multiple plotlines might have been confusing, but Robinson keeps everything clear and comprehensible - a novel with important things to say. It’s just not quite my kind of novel.
bibliogramma: (Default)

Paolo Bacigalupi's near-future dystopian thriller The Water Knife is a fast, hard ride through a drought-ridden Southwestern America where what little water remains is under the control of endlessly warring robber barons who live in sealed arcologies while the thirsty multitudes live in a hell where the strong rule and everyone else scrabbles to survive - but only barely.

Bacigalupi's novel belongs to the relatively new genre of what is called "climate fiction" - speculative novels, almost always dystopias, in which the effects of climate change on human life are a crucial part of the work, and as so, it is inherently a criticism of our lack of will and foresight in allowing such a future to be possible. But it is also, and perhaps more deeply, an examination of how far the concept of civil society can be degraded, how much of their dignity, morality and sense of connection people in desperate times will sacrifice to live one more day, how ruthless those with access to a limited power - in whatever sense - will go to hold onto their status. This is a world in which no one can be trusted, because anyone can be broken, and anyone will betray you for the dream of water.

The narrative focuses on water rights - in particular, documentation concerning senior rights to the Colorado River that will put anyone who owns them in the position of controlling the entire Southwest. Every major player is after them, and the list of mutilated bodies of people who someone thinks might know where they are hidden is growing. Angel is a water knife - a man whose job it is to cut through all the niceties to get whatever his employer needs to keep her control over the water she owns. And when he stumbles across the story of these old water rights, he knows it's up to him to get the rights for his boss. But no one knows who has them, and everyone, even Angel, is suspect. Also caught up on the bloody trail is Lucy, a journalist whose friend is seduced and murdered because of what he knows, and Maria, a destitute water peddler whose best friend is the mistress of another man who knows too much.

Toward the end of the novel, Angel and Lucy share a conversation that goes to the heart of the question Bacigalupi is asking. And the answer this novel gives us is grim indeed.

He shrugged. “Maybe people got choices. But mostly they just do what they’re pushed to do. You push, they stampede.” He nodded down at the screen and restarted the video. “And when shit really starts falling apart? Sure, people work together for a while, but not when it gets really bad. I read this article about one of those countries in Africa—Congo or Uganda or something. I was reading, thinking how shitty people are to each other, and then I got to a part where these soldiers, they…”

He glanced at Lucy, then looked away.

“They did a bunch of shit to a village.” He shrugged. “And it was exactly what some militia I worked with did to a bunch of Merry Perrys who tried to swim across the river to Nevada. And that was exactly like the cartels did when they took Chihuahua for good.

“It’s the same every time. All the rapes. All the chopped-off cocks that get shoved in dudes’ mouths, all the bodies burned with acid or lit on fire with gasoline and tires. Same shit, over and over.”

Lucy felt sick, listening to him. It was a view of the world that anticipated evil from people because people always delivered. And the worst part was that she couldn’t really argue.

“Like there’s something in our DNA,” she murmured, “that makes us into monsters.”

“Yeah. And we’re all the same monsters,” Angel said. “And it’s just accidents that turn us one way or another, but once we turn bad, it takes a long time for us to try to be something different.”


A taut, well-written suspense thriller with thought-provoking undertones.

Profile

bibliogramma: (Default)
bibliogramma

May 2019

S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930 31 

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 10th, 2025 09:21 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios