bibliogramma: (Default)
Yrsa Sigurdardottir’s novel “Why Did You Lie?” opens with a dramatic scene - a helicopter attempting an open sea rescue of a person reported lost at sea near an isolated lighthouse on a rugged rock formation offshore. What the occupants of the helicopter see is two bodies at the base if the rock tower, and at the top, beside the lighthouse, two people, one on the ground, the other kneeling over him with a knife. The date is January 28, 2014.

The timeline then splits, going backwards, to tell us about four people headed to the lighthouse two days prior - Helgi, a photographer, and Ivar, Tóti and Heida, making a scheduled maintenance visit.

Even further in the past, January 20, and we are with Nina, a police officer who has recently gone through extreme trauma. Her husband has survived a suicide attempt but is severely brain-damaged. She has been the victim of sexual harassment on the job, and a demoralising experience when, during a domestic assault call, the husband assaulted her as well and her partner just stood and watched. After issuing a complaint, she’s been banished to the dead files room in the basement to do clerical work. One if the first folders she opens to work on, unexpectedly, has a misfiled page - one that mentions her husband, and a statement he gave when only a teenager, twenty years ago.

And from January 23, a family returns from holiday. Nói, Vala and their son Tumi have been in the US, after arranging a house swap with an American family visiting Iceland. When they arrive home, they are unhappy to find the the Americans have left some things behind, and have not left the keys to the house and their chalet where they were asked too - in fact, the keys are missing altogether.

There is no hint, initially, of how these threads will be connected. Just mysteries. What happened at the remote lighthouse on Thrídrangar? Who put that page in that file fir Nina to find, and why? And what is it that seems subtly wrong about the departure of the Americans?

As the three timelines advance, odd things begin to pile up - creating an eerie feeing of suspense and discomfort, not quite fear at first, but growing toward it. This is something that Sigurdardottir does with consummate skill. You know something is wrong, you know it’s going to be bad, the only question is, how bad will it be?

Like so many of Sigurdardottir’s suspense novels, the evil behind the strangeness, the fear, the pain and death that follow, has its roots in the past, in darkness that has never been brought into the light, in madness born of loss and grief. And like the horror stories that Sigurdardottir borrows her sense of building atmosphere and tension, when all the threads come together and the full picture is revealed, something of the evil remains leaving us to fear what will come after.
bibliogramma: (Default)

There are times when I like reading crime fiction, particularly crime fiction featuring serial killers. Quite some years ago, I read several particularly gruesome novels of this sort - novels so gruesome, in fact, that they border on horror - by the Canadian writing consortium who call themselves Michael Slade. I rather enjoyed them at the time.

Being sick and miserable this holiday season, I decided to revisit this particular author, reading some of the older books, one that I'd read before but didn't remember well (Headhunter) and two I don't remember reading (Ripper and Primal Scream).

They did not age particularly well in some ways, though they definitely satisfied the itch I have to read such books from time to time. The structure of the books, particularly Headhunter, which was the first published, was clunky. The dialogue did not always ring true. Technically, they were at best mediocre.

I very much liked, and continue to like, the fact that these books feature Canadian protagonists, RCMP officers, and that they have a strong procedural focus.

The most difficult thing about them, however, is the way in which the author(s), in attempting to expose sexism and racism in Canadian society and in the RCMP, manage to perpetuate it in their writing. It's very unsettling to see them trying to create a central hero figure in DeClerq who is not overtly sexist or racist and whose internal commentary is intended at times to highlight issues of racism and sexism in history, society, the RCMP, its officers snd policies, and the process of policing, while at the same tine giving us other protagonists who are very much sexist and racist, and relying on tropes from the manhating lesbian feminist to the superstitious black pimp/drug dealer steeped in "voodoo" practices straight from the swamps surrounding New Orleans. Oh, there are admirable female characters and a few admirable indigenous characters when the plot demand it, but the treatment of these issues is disturbingly uneven.

Nonetheless, I plan to read some of Slade's newer novels and see what kind of growth, if any, there has been.

bibliogramma: (Default)


Jack the Ripper was not the only serial killer roaming the streets of London in 1888. Between 1887 and 1889, at least three women were killed and dismembered, and parts of their bodies disposed of in the Thames, although in one case, the torso and other parts were discovered on the grounds of the construction site for the new Scotland Yard building. The identity of the Thames Torso killer has never been determined, and there is some question as to whether the three murders he is agreed to have committed are the full extent of his crimes, as similar cases, also unsolved, had occurred in 1873-4 and 1884.

In Mayhem, Sarah Pinbourough infuses the facts of the Thames Torso Murders with a markedly supernatural story of possession by an ancient spirit of evil. The novel is centred on police surgeon Thomas Bond, who was an early practitioner of the science of forensic profiling, having produced a profile of the Ripper. Bond did play a historical role in the investigation of both the Ripper and the Thames Torso killer, performing autopsies on both Mary Jane Kelly and the second of the Torso killer's victims, Elizabeth Jackson. The novel gives him a much greater role, however, in the detection and final resolution of the murders.

I thoroughly enjoyed Pinborough's genre-bending historical crime horror novel on all counts.

bibliogramma: (Default)

Early in the year I got into one of my occasional phases of interest in serial killers, and I did sone reading but was mostly dissatisfied. I'm not into reading about serial killers for the shock value of what exactly they've done, nor for the takes of the relentless detective work that brings them to justice. What I'm interested in is why they do it, what sets apart this particular group of human beings. Morrison's book came closest to what I wanted to be reading, but it was still too much about the crines and not the mind of the criminals. And unfortunately, Cornwell's new theory about the Ripper was just too far fetched.

John Douglas (with Mark Olshaker), Journey into Darkness
Roy Hazelwood (with Stephen Michaud), The Evil Men Do
Robert Keppel, The Riverman
Ann Rule, Green River, Running Red
Patricia Cornwell, Portrait of a Killer
Helen Morrison, My Life Among the Serial Killers

Profile

bibliogramma: (Default)
bibliogramma

May 2019

S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930 31 

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 18th, 2025 08:44 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios