Who Killed the Princes in the Tower?
May. 4th, 2008 04:16 pmDaughter of Time, Josephine Tey
Daughter of Time is a fascinating blend of genres, a historical whodunnit - a bored police inspector, injured on his most recent case, and confined to a hospital bed, decides to tackle one of the great mysteries in English history: who killed - or caused to be killed - the princes in the Tower?
For those who have forgotten, or never knew, the story, the princes were the two sons of King Edward IV, last seen alive in the Tower of London in the summer of 1483, shortly after their uncle, Richard III, became king. The accession of the oldest prince, who would have been Edward V, may have been put off because of some doubt as to whether the marriage of Edward IV and their mother, Elizabeth Woodville, was legitimate, as Edward was rumoured to have been contracted to marry another woman, Eleanor Butler, at the time of his secret marriage to Elizabeth Woodville. It's possible that, in light of this possible bastardy, and the availability of an experienced adult heir in Richard, that Richard was seen as the better choice at the time by all. Many historians have argued, however, that Richard had the princes killed to strengthen his hold on the throne.
However, by fall of 1485, Henry Tudor had invaded England and defeated Richard III in battle at Bosworth Field and claimed the throne of England by right of his descent from Edward III's son John of Gaunt and his mistress (later wife) Katherine Swynford and by right of his betrothal to Elizabeth of York - the older sister of the princes in the tower. If the princes were still alive at that time, by ensuring that Elizabeth was seen as legitimate, Henry also legitimated the two survivors of the Wars of the Roses with better claims to the throne than his - so, if they were alive, he had a powerful motive to have them killed as well.
James Tyrell, an English knight who served both Richard III and Henry VII, confessed to the murder of the princes under torture in 1501 after being arrested for treason in another matter altogether.
There is no consensus among historians as to who killed the princes - and some believe that they were not, in fact, killed at all, but either died of natural causes or were secretly removed from the Tower and sent somewhere far away.
In Daughter of Time, Tey argues persuasively - through the medium of Inspector Alan Grant and his examination of contemporary accounts and historical analyses from the perspective of an experienced homicide detective - that the evidence against Henry Tudor is much stronger than the evidence against Richard III. Whether you accept Tey's arguments or not, the novel is compelling reading both for those how enjoy historical accounts and those who enjoy a good mystery.